Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Concurrent block get #236

Closed
alanshaw opened this issue Jul 18, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Concurrent block get #236

alanshaw opened this issue Jul 18, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
effort/days Estimated to take multiple days, but less than a week exp/intermediate Prior experience is likely helpful need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization status/ready Ready to be worked

Comments

@alanshaw
Copy link
Member

One thing I'm seeing in the unixfs exporter is single block gets over bitswap. Basically, I think that this is causing bitswap messages with only 1 block to be sent out since we're waiting for each one. I think we might be able to get a nice speed up if all the links (or a sensible subset) were requested from the blockstore (bitswap) concurrently.
@alanshaw alanshaw added the need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization label Jul 18, 2022
@achingbrain achingbrain added status/ready Ready to be worked exp/intermediate Prior experience is likely helpful effort/days Estimated to take multiple days, but less than a week labels Jul 18, 2022
@alanshaw alanshaw mentioned this issue Jul 21, 2022
Closed
@achingbrain
Copy link
Member

Fixed by #249 and #286

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
effort/days Estimated to take multiple days, but less than a week exp/intermediate Prior experience is likely helpful need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization status/ready Ready to be worked
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@alanshaw @achingbrain