Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 12, 2024. It is now read-only.

Update libp2p-ipfs-nodejs to version 0.17.0 🚀 #659

Closed

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

libp2p-ipfs-nodejs just published its new version 0.17.0.

State Update 🚀
Dependency libp2p-ipfs-nodejs
New version 0.17.0
Type dependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of libp2p-ipfs-nodejs.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


The new version differs by 7 commits .

  • 05af309 chore: release version v0.17.0
  • bdf89d3 chore: update contributors
  • c05f6a2 Merge pull request #46 from ipfs/feat/add-options
  • 4f03d80 feat: add mdns discovery to libp2p-ipfs-nodejs
  • b3d8de6 feat: add options object
  • eafe723 Merge pull request #45 from ipfs/greenkeeper-aegir-9.2.1
  • ce0a947 chore(package): update aegir to version 9.2.1

See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡ greenkeeper upgrade

@daviddias daviddias closed this Dec 12, 2016
@daviddias daviddias deleted the greenkeeper-libp2p-ipfs-nodejs-0.17.0 branch December 12, 2016 04:36
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants