Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(dht/pb) move proto to pb package #197

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

btc
Copy link
Contributor

@btc btc commented Oct 24, 2014

No description provided.

@btc btc added the status/in-progress In progress label Oct 24, 2014
kb "github.com/jbenet/go-ipfs/routing/kbucket"
u "github.com/jbenet/go-ipfs/util"

context "github.com/jbenet/go-ipfs/Godeps/_workspace/src/code.google.com/p/go.net/context"
proto "github.com/jbenet/go-ipfs/Godeps/_workspace/src/code.google.com/p/goprotobuf/proto"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❤️

@jbenet
Copy link
Member

jbenet commented Oct 24, 2014

LGTM! ready to merge

@jbenet
Copy link
Member

jbenet commented Oct 24, 2014

(wow, imagine the madness trying to do these refactors without a compiler)

@btc
Copy link
Contributor Author

btc commented Oct 25, 2014

(wow, imagine the madness trying to do these refactors without a compiler)

I know, right?

NB: build failed due to bitswap error. I believe that was caused by concurrent access to the bitswap ledger map. This has been addressed. f73d632

@btc
Copy link
Contributor Author

btc commented Oct 25, 2014

rebased on go vet changes here #205

@btc btc closed this Oct 25, 2014
@btc btc removed the status/in-progress In progress label Oct 25, 2014
@jbenet jbenet deleted the fix/move_proto branch October 25, 2014 13:52
@aschmahmann aschmahmann mentioned this pull request Dec 1, 2021
80 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants