Removed old drafts, added new one #6
Conversation
|
For this week only, maybe add a small text in the opening paragraph along the lines of:
|
RichardLitt
force-pushed
the
feature/jan-5
branch
from
69afed5 to
8f3ae9a
Compare
|
@eminence That is really weird, I had written that into a paragraph, but I seem to have deleted it. Will add that in again, now. |
RichardLitt
force-pushed
the
feature/jan-5
branch
from
8f3ae9a to
ced42ed
Compare
|
@eminence Added. Also added our names at the bottom, and a feedback link. |
| * Travis Person | ||
| * digital dreamer | ||
| * dignifiedquire | ||
| * greenkeeperio-bot |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
bots reserve love and recognition too, you know!
|
There is also mix of protocol and protocol-less hyperlinks. It is not a big issue but using one style would be better. |
| Across the entire IPFS github organization, the following people have comitted code since December 7th. (We're autogenerating this list using [this tool](https://github.com/ipfs/weekly/pull/5), so please let us know if your name isn't here.) In the future, we will also include people who comment, as they are also super important; bear with us while we develop that technology. | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| * Adam Gashlin |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i think these names should be fromatted as:
- @githubusername (Real Name)
we use github usernames for everything else, but yes we should have real names here (IF they show the real name on github or the commit. if github and the commit do not have the real name, respect their privacy)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
agreed. the username comes from git, so i consider it to be what the user would like to be publicly identified as. the only mapping done is when it is obvious that a nickname is an alias for a public real name.
we don't list the github handles at the moment because we don't have a good way to get them. this will be fixed in the future though
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I got them all manually. We can automatically do this in the future.
|
3 comments above, otherwise this LGTM. thanks guys this is a great, great start |
|
Cool. I addressed all comments, I think adequately. |
|
24 hours is up! let's merge this sucker! |
|
do ittt |
Removed old drafts, added new one
|
Awesome! 👍 👏 👏 👏
embedded: |
|
Great, stuff, thanks everyone
|
Alright, this is the draft for this week's roundup. Thoughts?
You have 24 hours to respond before I post this on the Blog and on IPFS/IPFS. That means by Jan 7, at 2200 UTC.