-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
feat: .get(<array of CIDs>) #132
Comments
I think it would make sense to put this into Bitswap. Though I'm not sure if that will be easy (the way Bitswap works today). I don't have usable code for this. |
This already exists on Bitswap. We need it here to trickle it down. This is needed for ipfs/js-ipfs#856 and should be quick to implement I made a graph to explain today's architecture ipfs/js-ipfs#1673 it should help understand how the ask for the multiple CIDs gets trickled. |
@vmx this is labeled as P0 Critical since Jun 4, it should be a simple change. Do you disagree with the priority? Feel free to adjust the label. |
@diasdavid This slipped my attention, I'll have a look. thanks for pinging. |
@vmx develop the habit at checking the waffle board and use filters to help you understand what is top priority (and also to communicate to others). https://waffle.io/ipld/js-ipld https://waffle.io/ipld/js-ipld?label=P0%20-%20Criticalhttps://waffle.io/ipld/js-ipld?label=P1%20-%20High |
With `getMany()` it's possible to get several blocks with one call. Closes #132.
With `getMany()` it's possible to get several blocks with one call. Closes #132.
With `getMany()` it's possible to get several blocks with one call. Closes #132.
With `getMany()` it's possible to get several blocks with one call. Closes #132.
We need an endpoint for https://github.com/ipfs/js-ipfs-unixfs-engine that can return multiple IPLD nodes from an Array of CIDs.
Leverage ipfs/js-ipfs-block-service#81
This is blocking ipfs/js-ipfs#856.
@vmx do you already have code for this with the GraphSync endeavour?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: