Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add e2e test for sampling storage #4772

Merged

Conversation

slayer321
Copy link
Contributor

Which problem is this PR solving?

Description of the changes

  • Adding e2e test for Implemented Storage backends for adaptive sampling i.e (cassendra, in-memory)

How was this change tested?

Checklist

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 22, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 12 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Files Coverage Δ
plugin/storage/integration/integration.go 73.86% <77.77%> (+0.67%) ⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!.

@slayer321 slayer321 force-pushed the e2e-test-for-sampling-store branch from b2fd20a to f819541 Compare September 25, 2023 12:31
@slayer321 slayer321 changed the title [WIP] Add e2e test for sampling storage Add e2e test for sampling storage Sep 25, 2023
@slayer321 slayer321 marked this pull request as ready for review September 25, 2023 12:37
@slayer321 slayer321 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 25, 2023 12:37
@slayer321 slayer321 force-pushed the e2e-test-for-sampling-store branch 2 times, most recently from e5210fd to 99826b5 Compare September 29, 2023 06:09
Signed-off-by: slayer321 <sachin.maurya7666@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: slayer321 <sachin.maurya7666@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: slayer321 <sachin.maurya7666@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: slayer321 <sachin.maurya7666@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: slayer321 <sachin.maurya7666@gmail.com>
@slayer321 slayer321 force-pushed the e2e-test-for-sampling-store branch from 99826b5 to 762ee0c Compare October 1, 2023 12:36
@yurishkuro yurishkuro merged commit 58fe998 into jaegertracing:main Oct 1, 2023
30 of 31 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants