ci: add retry logic in the Install Go Tip GitHub Action

[akagami-harsh]

Which problem is this PR solving?

• Fixes Implement retry logic in the Install Go Tip GitHub Action #5021

Description of the changes

• added retry logic in Go Tip Github Action

How was this change tested?

• in below case it ran successfully
• but the logic was not used because the curl command did not any return code
• https://github.com/akagami-harsh/jaeger/actions/runs/7266233916/job/19797565337

Checklist

• I have read https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
• I have signed all commits
• I have added unit tests for the new functionality
• I have run lint and test steps successfully
  • for jaeger: make lint test
  • for jaeger-ui: yarn lint and yarn test

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (d4b0373) 95.61% compared to head (bd007a7) 95.61%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5022      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.61%   95.61%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         319      319              
  Lines       18786    18786              
==========================================
- Hits        17963    17962       -1     
  Misses        661      661              
- Partials      162      163       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
cassandra-3.x	25.63% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x	25.63% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-5.x	19.90% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-6.x	19.90% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-7.x	20.04% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x	20.13% <ø> (ø)
grpc-badger	19.53% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
kafka	14.12% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-1.x	20.04% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
opensearch-2.x	20.04% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
unittests	93.35% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[yurishkuro]

thanks!