Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "feat(privatek8s): adding a large arm64 nodepool" #635

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2024

Conversation

smerle33
Copy link
Collaborator

@smerle33 smerle33 commented Mar 4, 2024

Reverts #633

as we have an error :

Plan: 1 to add, 0 to change, 0 to destroy.
azurerm_kubernetes_cluster_node_pool.infracilargearm64: Creating...
Error: 
The Kubernetes/Orchestrator Version "1.26.6" is not available for Node Pool "arm64large".

Please confirm that this version is supported by the Kubernetes Cluster "privatek8s-emerging-ram"
(Resource Group "prod-privatek8s") - which may need to be upgraded first.

The Kubernetes Cluster is running version "1.26.6".

The supported Orchestrator Versions for this Node Pool/supported by this Kubernetes Cluster are:


Node Pools cannot use a version of Kubernetes that is not supported on the Control Plane. More
details can be found at https://aka.ms/version-skew-policy.


  with azurerm_kubernetes_cluster_node_pool.infracilargearm64,
  on privatek8s.tf line 172, in resource "azurerm_kubernetes_cluster_node_pool" "infracilargearm64":
 172: resource "azurerm_kubernetes_cluster_node_pool" "infracilargearm64" {


[2024-03-04T14:25:30.235Z] make: *** [Makefile:36: deploy] Error 1

@smerle33 smerle33 requested review from a team and lemeurherve March 4, 2024 14:59
@lemeurherve lemeurherve merged commit 3ecbd05 into main Mar 4, 2024
4 checks passed
@lemeurherve lemeurherve deleted the revert-633-nodepool/large/arm64 branch March 4, 2024 15:03
lemeurherve pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2024
as per #634 and
#635

need to upgrade to the latest patch version
smerle33 added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants