Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the status checks property to allow publishing unstable builds as neutral checks #124

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 10, 2021

Conversation

XiongKezhi
Copy link
Contributor

@XiongKezhi XiongKezhi added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 9, 2021
@XiongKezhi XiongKezhi self-assigned this Feb 9, 2021
@XiongKezhi XiongKezhi requested a review from a team as a code owner February 9, 2021 18:26
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 9, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #124 (54adb21) into master (b6fa410) will increase coverage by 0.43%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #124      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     82.37%   82.81%   +0.43%     
- Complexity      148      154       +6     
============================================
  Files            13       13              
  Lines           437      448      +11     
  Branches         41       41              
============================================
+ Hits            360      371      +11     
  Misses           61       61              
  Partials         16       16              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...ithub/status/GitHubSCMSourceStatusChecksTrait.java 60.71% <100.00%> (+6.54%) 7.00 <2.00> (+2.00)
...ithub/status/GitHubStatusChecksConfigurations.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) 0.00 <0.00> (ø)
...ks/github/status/GitHubStatusChecksProperties.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) 14.00 <4.00> (+2.00)
...cks/github/status/GitSCMStatusChecksExtension.java 84.21% <100.00%> (+4.21%) 7.00 <2.00> (+2.00)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b6fa410...54adb21. Read the comment docs.

@@ -1,13 +1,7 @@
<?jelly escape-by-default='true'?>
<j:jelly xmlns:j="jelly:core" xmlns:f="/lib/form">
<j:jelly xmlns:j="jelly:core" xmlns:f="/lib/form" xmlns:i="/io/jenkins/plugins/checks/github/status">
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is the convention normally used

Suggested change
<j:jelly xmlns:j="jelly:core" xmlns:f="/lib/form" xmlns:i="/io/jenkins/plugins/checks/github/status">
<j:jelly xmlns:j="jelly:core" xmlns:f="/lib/form" xmlns:g="/lib/github-checks/status">

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you mean I'll need to create new folders specifically to include these lib files?

XiongKezhi and others added 3 commits February 10, 2021 14:26
Copy link
Member

@timja timja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I haven't tested manually but this looks sane, (not that I would ever use this feature)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants