-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 236
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: create prefer-to-be
rule
#864
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
G-Rath
force-pushed
the
create-actual-prefer-to-be
branch
from
July 22, 2021 22:07
865849b
to
858a1a8
Compare
How about make this rule configurable? As mentioned in #821 (comment). We could make its API defaults to: 'jest/prefer-to-be': ['error', {
types: ['number', 'string', 'boolean', 'undefined', 'null', 'NaN']
}] |
LitoMore
reviewed
Jul 23, 2021
LitoMore
approved these changes
Jul 29, 2021
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 29, 2021
# [24.5.0](v24.4.3...v24.5.0) (2021-09-29) ### Bug Fixes * **no-deprecated-functions:** remove `process.cwd` from resolve paths ([#889](#889)) ([6940488](6940488)) * **no-identical-title:** always consider `.each` titles unique ([#910](#910)) ([a41a40e](a41a40e)) ### Features * create `prefer-expect-resolves` rule ([#822](#822)) ([2556020](2556020)) * create `prefer-to-be` rule ([#864](#864)) ([3a64aea](3a64aea)) * **require-top-level-describe:** support enforcing max num of describes ([#912](#912)) ([14a2d13](14a2d13)) * **valid-title:** allow custom matcher messages ([#913](#913)) ([ffc9392](ffc9392))
🎉 This PR is included in version 24.5.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 29, 2021
# [25.0.0-next.5](v25.0.0-next.4...v25.0.0-next.5) (2021-09-29) ### Bug Fixes * **no-deprecated-functions:** remove `process.cwd` from resolve paths ([#889](#889)) ([6940488](6940488)) * **no-identical-title:** always consider `.each` titles unique ([#910](#910)) ([a41a40e](a41a40e)) * **valid-expect-in-promise:** support `finally` ([#914](#914)) ([9c89855](9c89855)) * **valid-expect-in-promise:** support additional test functions ([#915](#915)) ([4798005](4798005)) ### Features * create `prefer-expect-resolves` rule ([#822](#822)) ([2556020](2556020)) * create `prefer-to-be` rule ([#864](#864)) ([3a64aea](3a64aea)) * **require-top-level-describe:** support enforcing max num of describes ([#912](#912)) ([14a2d13](14a2d13)) * **valid-title:** allow custom matcher messages ([#913](#913)) ([ffc9392](ffc9392))
🎉 This PR is included in version 25.0.0-next.5 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
An even better version of #821 (plus it doesn't flag
toBe
🤦).This deprecates
prefer-to-be-undefined
&prefer-to-be-null
, as well as supportingtoBeDefined
(vstoBeUndefined
). (@SimenB let me know if you're happy with this, or if you think they should stay as different rules)Closes #821
Closes #801