Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make GzipHandler module more configurable #1761

Closed
joakime opened this issue Aug 22, 2017 · 1 comment · Fixed by #5248
Closed

Make GzipHandler module more configurable #1761

joakime opened this issue Aug 22, 2017 · 1 comment · Fixed by #5248
Assignees

Comments

@joakime
Copy link
Contributor

joakime commented Aug 22, 2017

There are a number of configuration options in GzipHandler that are not currently available as properties in the gzip.mod

Include/Exclude paths
Include/Excludes mime-types

There are already properties for Include/Exclude methods, It would been keen to see new properties for these as well.

Existing properties:

jetty.gzip.excludedMethodList
jetty.gzip.includedMethodList

Proposed new properties:

jetty.gzip.excludedPathList=<comma or pipe delim list>
jetty.gzip.includedPathList=<comma or pipe delim list>
jetty.gzip.excludedMimeTypeList=<comma or pipe delim list>
jetty.gzip.includedMimeTypeList=<comma or pipe delim list>
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 20, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been a full year without activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the Stale For auto-closed stale issues and pull requests label Nov 20, 2019
@joakime joakime removed the Stale For auto-closed stale issues and pull requests label Nov 20, 2019
@olamy olamy self-assigned this Nov 21, 2019
lachlan-roberts added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 8, 2020
Signed-off-by: Lachlan Roberts <lachlan@webtide.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants