-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue #10066 - Allow customization of SAXParserFactory
and SAXParser
in XmlParser
#10299
Conversation
…er` in `XmlParser` (#10067) * Allow customization of SAXParserFactory / SAXParser in XmlParser * Introduce method `.getSAXParser()` --------- Signed-off-by: Joakim Erdfelt <joakim.erdfelt@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
Strange test failures on 8u382 that didn't happen on my 8u362 machine. |
Signed-off-by: Joakim Erdfelt <joakim.erdfelt@gmail.com>
The JDK difference was a red herring. |
Signed-off-by: Joakim Erdfelt <joakim.erdfelt@gmail.com>
…y-10.0.x`) (#10098) * Now that the migration of `https://eclipse.org/jetty/` to `https://eclipse.dev/jetty/` has occurred, it is time to review the URI use in our project + Added more URIs to XmlConfiguration --------- Signed-off-by: Joakim Erdfelt <joakim.erdfelt@gmail.com>
Had to cherry-pick a (limited form of) commit a9c596e back to |
…the problem Signed-off-by: Joakim Erdfelt <joakim.erdfelt@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joakim Erdfelt <joakim.erdfelt@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joakim Erdfelt <joakim.erdfelt@gmail.com>
Thanks for backporting this! 🙏 Does this backport mean the affected versions of GHSA-58qw-p7qm-5rvh can be updated to exclude |
On the assumption that this appears to do so, based on how the earlier advisory was structured for 10.x and 11.x and affected versions and PRs, I've suggested updating the main advisory via github/advisory-database#2673 I am not entirely clear how GHSA-58qw-p7qm-5rvh is linked to the github-reviewed variant, so if this is inappropriate,let me know and I'll cancel it. Just trying to help out. 🙏 |
@chadlwilson do you use Jetty's If the answer is no, then you are not vulnerable to GHSA-58qw-p7qm-5rvh |
@joakime I am aware of this distinction. This isn't about my personal usage - already suppressed the reported vulns on that basis a while back. However it's still useful to get scanner noise to go away for the wider community so there are fewer reported vulns for folks to investigate if they keep their dependencies updated. Trivy is detecting this one right now on container image scans which also means the Helm Artifact Hub is doing the same if publishing OSS images there. |
@chadlwilson we updated the affected / patched versions in our repository version of the GHSA-58qw-p7qm-5rvh advisory And submitted a PR to change the public advisory as well |
Backport of PR #10067 to
jetty-9.4.x
.getSAXParser()