Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
selftests/bpf: Add more test case for field flattening
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Add three success test cases to test the flattening of array of nested
struct. For these three tests, the number of special fields in map is
BTF_FIELDS_MAX, but the array is defined in structs with different
nested level.

Add one failure test case for the flattening as well. In the test case,
the number of special fields in map is BTF_FIELDS_MAX + 1. It will make
btf_parse_fields() in map_create() return -E2BIG, the creation of map
will succeed, but the load of program will fail because the btf_record
is invalid for the map.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241008071114.3718177-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
  • Loading branch information
Hou Tao authored and Alexei Starovoitov committed Oct 9, 2024
1 parent 797d73e commit c456f08
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 4 changed files with 117 additions and 2 deletions.
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ static const char * const cpumask_success_testcases[] = {
"test_global_mask_array_l2_rcu",
"test_global_mask_nested_rcu",
"test_global_mask_nested_deep_rcu",
"test_global_mask_nested_deep_array_rcu",
"test_cpumask_weight",
};

Expand Down
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_common.h
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -7,6 +7,11 @@
#include "errno.h"
#include <stdbool.h>

/* Should use BTF_FIELDS_MAX, but it is not always available in vmlinux.h,
* so use the hard-coded number as a workaround.
*/
#define CPUMASK_KPTR_FIELDS_MAX 11

int err;

#define private(name) SEC(".bss." #name) __attribute__((aligned(8)))
Expand Down
35 changes: 35 additions & 0 deletions tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_failure.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -10,6 +10,21 @@

char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";

struct kptr_nested_array_2 {
struct bpf_cpumask __kptr * mask;
};

struct kptr_nested_array_1 {
/* Make btf_parse_fields() in map_create() return -E2BIG */
struct kptr_nested_array_2 d_2[CPUMASK_KPTR_FIELDS_MAX + 1];
};

struct kptr_nested_array {
struct kptr_nested_array_1 d_1;
};

private(MASK_NESTED) static struct kptr_nested_array global_mask_nested_arr;

/* Prototype for all of the program trace events below:
*
* TRACE_EVENT(task_newtask,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -187,3 +202,23 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_rcu_no_null_check, struct task_struct *task, u64 c

return 0;
}

SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
__failure __msg("has no valid kptr")
int BPF_PROG(test_invalid_nested_array, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
{
struct bpf_cpumask *local, *prev;

local = create_cpumask();
if (!local)
return 0;

prev = bpf_kptr_xchg(&global_mask_nested_arr.d_1.d_2[CPUMASK_KPTR_FIELDS_MAX].mask, local);
if (prev) {
bpf_cpumask_release(prev);
err = 3;
return 0;
}

return 0;
}
78 changes: 76 additions & 2 deletions tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -31,11 +31,59 @@ struct kptr_nested_deep {
struct kptr_nested_pair ptr_pairs[3];
};

struct kptr_nested_deep_array_1_2 {
int dummy;
struct bpf_cpumask __kptr * mask[CPUMASK_KPTR_FIELDS_MAX];
};

struct kptr_nested_deep_array_1_1 {
int dummy;
struct kptr_nested_deep_array_1_2 d_2;
};

struct kptr_nested_deep_array_1 {
long dummy;
struct kptr_nested_deep_array_1_1 d_1;
};

struct kptr_nested_deep_array_2_2 {
long dummy[2];
struct bpf_cpumask __kptr * mask;
};

struct kptr_nested_deep_array_2_1 {
int dummy;
struct kptr_nested_deep_array_2_2 d_2[CPUMASK_KPTR_FIELDS_MAX];
};

struct kptr_nested_deep_array_2 {
long dummy;
struct kptr_nested_deep_array_2_1 d_1;
};

struct kptr_nested_deep_array_3_2 {
long dummy[2];
struct bpf_cpumask __kptr * mask;
};

struct kptr_nested_deep_array_3_1 {
int dummy;
struct kptr_nested_deep_array_3_2 d_2;
};

struct kptr_nested_deep_array_3 {
long dummy;
struct kptr_nested_deep_array_3_1 d_1[CPUMASK_KPTR_FIELDS_MAX];
};

private(MASK) static struct bpf_cpumask __kptr * global_mask_array[2];
private(MASK) static struct bpf_cpumask __kptr * global_mask_array_l2[2][1];
private(MASK) static struct bpf_cpumask __kptr * global_mask_array_one[1];
private(MASK) static struct kptr_nested global_mask_nested[2];
private(MASK_DEEP) static struct kptr_nested_deep global_mask_nested_deep;
private(MASK_1) static struct kptr_nested_deep_array_1 global_mask_nested_deep_array_1;
private(MASK_2) static struct kptr_nested_deep_array_2 global_mask_nested_deep_array_2;
private(MASK_3) static struct kptr_nested_deep_array_3 global_mask_nested_deep_array_3;

static bool is_test_task(void)
{
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -543,12 +591,21 @@ static int _global_mask_array_rcu(struct bpf_cpumask **mask0,
goto err_exit;
}

/* [<mask 0>, NULL] */
if (!*mask0 || *mask1) {
/* [<mask 0>, *] */
if (!*mask0) {
err = 2;
goto err_exit;
}

if (!mask1)
goto err_exit;

/* [*, NULL] */
if (*mask1) {
err = 3;
goto err_exit;
}

local = create_cpumask();
if (!local) {
err = 9;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -631,6 +688,23 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_nested_deep_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clo
return 0;
}

SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_nested_deep_array_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
{
int i;

for (i = 0; i < CPUMASK_KPTR_FIELDS_MAX; i++)
_global_mask_array_rcu(&global_mask_nested_deep_array_1.d_1.d_2.mask[i], NULL);

for (i = 0; i < CPUMASK_KPTR_FIELDS_MAX; i++)
_global_mask_array_rcu(&global_mask_nested_deep_array_2.d_1.d_2[i].mask, NULL);

for (i = 0; i < CPUMASK_KPTR_FIELDS_MAX; i++)
_global_mask_array_rcu(&global_mask_nested_deep_array_3.d_1[i].d_2.mask, NULL);

return 0;
}

SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
int BPF_PROG(test_cpumask_weight, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
{
Expand Down

0 comments on commit c456f08

Please sign in to comment.