Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Performance Improvement and possibility to add a start date to task #171

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

morstin
Copy link

@morstin morstin commented Apr 11, 2020

  • better performance if re-reading files:
    When updating the TodoReview window only changed files are read newly - this makes the work flow very nice as you can change your todos and quickly update your TodoReview window even if you have thousands of files in your project

  • adding the possibiliy to specify a start date with @start(yyyy-mm-dd) in the TODO item
    results will then be grouped into: (1) Now, (2) Important, (3) Someday and (4) Future by following rules

(1) Now: start-date of today or older
(2) Important: above defined priority - default < 80
(3) Someday: all items with below defined priority - default >= 80
(4) Future: start-date in the future

This gives a system similar to what is described by https://www.michaellinenberger.com/mywn-book.html
http://blog.clearcontext.com/WindowsLiveWriter/conveyorIdeal2.png

- better performance if re-reading files:
When updating the TodoReview only changed files are read newly - this makes the work flow very nice

- adding the possibiliy to specify a start date with @start(yyyy-mm-dd) in the TODO item
results will then be grouped into: (1) Now, (2) Important, (3) Someday and (4) Future by following rules

(1) Now: start-date of today or older
(2) Important: above defined priority - default < 80
(3) Someday: all items with below defined priority - default >= 80
(4) Future: start-date in the future

This gives a system similar to what is described by https://www.michaellinenberger.com/mywn-book.html 
http://blog.clearcontext.com/WindowsLiveWriter/conveyorIdeal2.png
@jfcherng
Copy link

jfcherng commented Jul 9, 2020

For people who may interest, I have my performance improvement on my fork too.

@dg-pb
Copy link

dg-pb commented Dec 13, 2023

For people who may interest, I have my performance improvement on my fork too.

If using set, seen_paths is not needed anymore I believe.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants