Add support for OSSF scorecard reporting

[carpasse]

Main Changes

This pipeline will proactively report the status of the project (every day and when a push is done to master branch) including critical fields (CI-Tests, Contributors, Dependency-Update-Tool, Webhooks) that are missing while running via OSSF cron jobs.

Context

Changes related

It's also possible that some repositories in your organization are already being automatically tracked by OpenSSF in this CSV file via weekly cronjob. One caveat: Automatically tracked projects do not include ossf/scorecard#3438 in their analysis (CI-Tests,Contributors,Dependency-Update-Tool,Webhooks).

Source: openssf-scorecard-monitor documentation

Team discussion related

Ref: expressjs/security-wg#2
Report: https://kooltheba.github.io/openssf-scorecard-api-visualizer/#/projects/github.com/jshttp/http-errors/commit/206aa2c15635dc1212c06c279540972aa90e23ea

Changelog
c33f053 chore: add scorecard pipeline by @carpasse

[UlisesGascon]

LGTM! Thanks for the work @carpasse.

I updated the report url in the PR description to https://kooltheba.github.io/openssf-scorecard-api-visualizer/#/projects/github.com/jshttp/http-errors/commit/206aa2c15635dc1212c06c279540972aa90e23ea as the previous one was pointing to express package 😉

[UlisesGascon]

The CI is failing due #108, and it is not related to this PR as the change does not affect the source code or the existing GA pipelines.

I will merge this PR on next Monday, unless there are concerns.

[jonchurch]

Not worth blocking on, but is there a reason to use this ad hoc workflow vs the official ossf github action? Does this workflow do different things than the action or is otherwise preferred over the versioned and maintained action?

https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action

[UlisesGascon]

Not worth blocking on, but is there a reason to use this ad hoc workflow vs the official ossf github action? Does this workflow do different things than the action or is otherwise preferred over the versioned and maintained action?

We use the same one (official one), for reference: expressjs/discussions#185 (comment)