New feature - convert to Hash #2
Conversation
- Added usage example in README - Added a changelog file - Bump version Signed-off-by: SteveBenner <sbenner9@gmail.com>
- added Hashugar#to_s for pretty structured output
- replaced rvm ruby version file with chruby ruby version file - added Hashugar#to_s for pretty structured output - added TODO's for future plans for this project - taking over completely from previous maintainer, as it appears he is not in contact, and Hashugar is becoming it's own beast anyway with all of my modifications
…uses a default of empty `Hash` - removed old TODO file - modified license to reflect ownership of project - bump version - TODO: cleanup Rakefile
…S`, a Struct with custom behavior - added capability of `Hashugar` to enable translation of all hyphens in Hash keys into underscores via runtime method replacement - todo: look into privacy of `stringify_keys` and see if we can't tighten things up a bit more - removed files in `/vendor/` recursively from cached index (what where they doing in there...)
- Now returns a Hash of the options, instead of Struct inspect string - Added the actual setter element of `Hashugar::OPTIONS.dehyphenate_keys` (whoops!)
- updated to version 0.0.12, which includes new methods `Hashugar#update` and `Hashugar::[]`.
…ME and documentation - removed significant code, slimming down the `Hashugar` class - updated gemspec - updated license - updated README and CHANGELOG - bumped version
|
Oof... Embarrassing, but a what a great example of how NOT to Open Source 🤣 I don't even recall making this request, but apparently back in my noob days I thought it was acceptable to merge my monstrous 18-commit mutation of this lib into trunk LOL. |
|
@SteveBenner this was completely unnecessary. This is not how opensource works. I have no obligation to accept and support code from pull requests. I am sorry that I didn't respond sooner though. |
I'm not sure what you mean by this, would you mind clarifying? I personally have several major issues with this pull request--not only does it massively re-write the library to my own whim, it's actually atrocious on many accounts.
As the author, I felt it was absolutely necessary to remove.
I'm aware of this... Realize that this was in start of my (self-taught) career, and I was clueless about software development 🙃. Now that I am versed in methodologies/protocols for contributing useful and quality code patches, I look forward to submitting some proper feature requests... |
to_new_hashfor deep conversion of a object to a regular RubyHashREADME.md(I'll add more examples most likely)CHANGELOG.mdSigned-off-by: SteveBenner sbenner9@gmail.com