Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add test for date types in actix params #758

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 15, 2023

Conversation

jayvdb
Copy link
Contributor

@jayvdb jayvdb commented Sep 10, 2023

Relates to #693

@jayvdb jayvdb force-pushed the actix-date-params-test branch from 1c128d1 to cde0eda Compare September 10, 2023 04:54
@jayvdb jayvdb marked this pull request as ready for review September 10, 2023 04:58
@jayvdb jayvdb force-pushed the actix-date-params-test branch from cde0eda to d4434d1 Compare September 10, 2023 06:11
"[1].required" = r#"true"#, "Parameter required"
"[1].deprecated" = r#"null"#, "Parameter deprecated"
"[1].schema.type" = r#""string""#, "Parameter schema type"
"[1].schema.format" = r#"null"#, "Parameter schema format"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

note this is probably the problem described in #693 - format = DateTime does not override the rust arg being of type String.

I am not sure if this is expected / desirable behaviour.

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, I believe this is at least one of the inconsistencies between the without actix_web or other framework and with.

I don't remember what was the original thought when implementing this but now I could consider this as undesired behavior. I reckon the order of recognizing parameters should first come from fn arguments if framework is supported and later they should be overridable with manual params(...) definition.

@jayvdb jayvdb force-pushed the actix-date-params-test branch from d4434d1 to 56434c0 Compare September 10, 2023 06:24
Copy link
Owner

@juhaku juhaku left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Great work

@juhaku juhaku merged commit d7280eb into juhaku:master Sep 15, 2023
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants