-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: restore behavior that lists files that need formatting #32
Conversation
I think I addressed all the comments... |
Huh, guess I clicked "close" instead of "comment" :) |
@hyrodium how does this look to you? |
@domluna Sorry, I don't have time to review this PR at least for a few days. We already have some reviews, so merging when other reviewers approve seems okay! |
Co-authored-by: Morten Piibeleht <morten.piibeleht@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Morten Piibeleht <morten.piibeleht@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM now! All cases worked perfectly with branch as far as I can tell:
Success: https://github.com/JuliaComputing/JuliaHub.jl/actions/runs/9611403801/job/26509891661
Reviewdog: https://github.com/JuliaComputing/JuliaHub.jl/actions/runs/9611588130/job/26510453352?pr=61
Good to merge then? |
Add back in the list of files that need formatting. At least the action we used to use did that.
This way, if reviewdog doesn't run, you can at least see the files that need formatting.