Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix macos pypy check #632

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2021
Merged

Conversation

blink1073
Copy link
Contributor

@blink1073 blink1073 commented Dec 6, 2021

Hopefully fix recent errors seen on the macos pypy check. cf https://foss.heptapod.net/pypy/pypy/-/issues/3314

@blink1073 blink1073 added this to the 1.13 milestone Dec 6, 2021
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 6, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #632 (bddb79f) into master (b51969f) will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #632      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.72%   77.76%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         110      110              
  Lines       10444    10444              
  Branches     1415     1415              
==========================================
+ Hits         8118     8122       +4     
+ Misses       1925     1922       -3     
+ Partials      401      400       -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
jupyter_server/services/kernels/kernelmanager.py 83.17% <0.00%> (+1.26%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b51969f...bddb79f. Read the comment docs.

@blink1073 blink1073 merged commit 82cd791 into jupyter-server:master Dec 6, 2021
@blink1073 blink1073 deleted the fix-pypy branch December 6, 2021 22:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants