Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move notebook logging plugin to notebook-extension package #7830

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2020

Conversation

jasongrout
Copy link
Contributor

References

Code changes

We had a plugin that logged notebook output. For historical reasons, it was in the logconsole-extension package (basically so that we could introduce the logconsole-extension package into jlab 1.x with backwards compatibility).

It probably makes more sense for this extension to be in the notebook-extension package. One argument for it to stay in the logconsole-extension package is that the log console extension still depends on notebook to do automatic switching between log sources based on the current active notebook. At some point that may (should?) be changed to allow you to select the log source from the log console ux, however.

This isn't a huge deal, so if you don't want to merge it this close to the 2.0 release, that's fine.

User-facing changes

None.

Backwards-incompatible changes

This moves one of the plugins exported by the log console extension to the notebook extension.

@jupyterlab-dev-mode
Copy link

Thanks for making a pull request to JupyterLab!

To try out this branch on binder, follow this link: Binder

@jasongrout
Copy link
Contributor Author

Adding to the 2.0 milestone for consideration, but feel free to bump to 3.0 if there are concerns or reservations. It's not a huge deal, it's just putting plugins where they belong more naturally.

@blink1073 blink1073 modified the milestones: 2.0, 2.1 Feb 3, 2020
@jasongrout jasongrout modified the milestones: 2.1, 3.0 Mar 12, 2020
@blink1073
Copy link
Contributor

I think this makes sense to get it before the 3.0 RC if you want to rebase

@jasongrout
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll do it right now for the beta, since it is an api-breaking change

@jasongrout
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased on master

Copy link
Contributor

@blink1073 blink1073 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@jasongrout jasongrout merged commit 62c0821 into jupyterlab:master Aug 26, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added the status:resolved-locked Closed issues are locked after 30 days inactivity. Please open a new issue for related discussion. label Feb 23, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 23, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
pkg:logconsole pkg:notebook status:resolved-locked Closed issues are locked after 30 days inactivity. Please open a new issue for related discussion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants