Provision delivery format in contract

[Cali0707]

Fixes #3970

Proposed Changes

• Add the format field to the egress config

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 5.12821% with 37 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 48.27%. Comparing base (dcb704a) to head (d4d2007).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
control-plane/pkg/contract/contract.pb.go	3.12%	31 Missing ⚠️
control-plane/pkg/core/config/utils.go	14.28%	5 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3987      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   48.33%   48.27%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         244      244              
  Lines       14579    14600      +21     
==========================================
+ Hits         7047     7048       +1     
- Misses       6821     6840      +19     
- Partials      711      712       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[matzew]

/test upgrade-tests

[Cali0707]

@matzew I've rebased this to only have the relevant changes, can you recheck?

[matzew]

/lgtm
/approve

[knative-prow]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Cali0707, matzew

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [Cali0707,matzew]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[matzew]

/retest-required

[matzew]

/retest

[Cali0707]

/retest-required

[Cali0707]

/retest-required

[Cali0707]

/test upgrade-tests

[knative-prow]

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

[Cali0707]

/cc @matzew

While going through the data plane changes I realized I needed to essentially re-do the changes in this PR so since the data plane changes are isolated I added them here as well instead

I'll add unit tests and an e2e test later, would you mind taking a look at the data plane code and letting me know if the approach I'm taking makes sense?

[Cali0707]

/cc @pierDipi

[pierDipi]

/retest

[Cali0707]

/retest-required

[knative-prow]

@Cali0707: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
upgrade-tests_eventing-kafka-broker_main	9904915	link	true	/test upgrade-tests

Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[knative-prow-robot]

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[github-actions]

This Pull Request is stale because it has been open for 90 days with
no activity. It will automatically close after 30 more days of
inactivity. Reopen with /reopen. Mark as fresh by adding the
comment /remove-lifecycle stale.