Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add port-sniffer by Xsorter #32

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

xsorter
Copy link

@xsorter xsorter commented Nov 11, 2019

I've read ./README.md and ./CODE_QUALITY.md carefully.

The code is checked by yarn run lint:js and linter reported no errors.

The code is submitted in its own sub-directory and in a dedicated feature branch.

Please, review.

const range = findPortsRange();

const ports = {
firstPort: +range[0],
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Dont need every time add +` for converting type to number.
Just guarantee, that findPortsRange will return numbers

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for advice, changed type in function's return

socket.on('connect', () => {
clearTimeout(time);
socket.destroy();
process.stdout.write('.');
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Dont use process.stdout.write
Prefet to use console.log / warn

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done, changed to console.log

const showResult = host => {
if (args.help) {
process.stdout.write(messages().help);
process.exit(1);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bad practice to fail app with such aggressive methods :)

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Understand, i'll just return false than

process.stdout.write(messages().help);
process.exit(1);
}
if (!args.host) {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If no hosts -> let's ask again about hosts?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed this message

process.stdout.write(messages().noHost);
process.exit(1);
} else {
openedPortCheck(host, ports.firstPort, function nextIteration () {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This recursion is not effective due to huge memory usage, slowness, and other reasons.

I propose to you rewrite this to one of the ways:

  1. Async Iterations (can be paralleled like 10+ in one batch iterations, looks how https://caolan.github.io/async/v3/docs.html#mapLimit works)
  2. Generator (if use 12+ nodejs -> async generator)
  3. If you want recursion, let it be optimized, like tails recursion

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, i changed recursion with mapLimit

};

ipLookup()
.then(res => showResult(res))
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here you can use console.table to write better output

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@xsorter xsorter requested a review from denysovkos November 13, 2019 20:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants