Update README.md #77
Update README.md #77
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request includes multiple updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
README.md (4)
21-22: Consider removing the emoticon for a more professional tone.The note's content effectively communicates the project status and encourages feedback. However, the winky face emoticon (
;-)) might be too informal for technical documentation.-> Stamon is currently in active development and is not yet fully functional. However, you are welcome to try it out and provide feedback! ;-) +> Stamon is currently in active development and is not yet fully functional. However, you are welcome to try it out and provide feedback!
35-35: Use proper markdown link syntax.The bare URL should be formatted using markdown link syntax for better readability and maintainability.
-Although some features are missing the basic monitoring is working as expected. You can try it out and [open an issue](https://github.com/krivahtoo/stamon/issues) if you encounter any bugs or any feature you would like to be added to stamon. +Although some features are missing the basic monitoring is working as expected. You can try it out and [open an issue][issues] if you encounter any bugs or any feature you would like to be added to stamon. +[issues]: https://github.com/krivahtoo/stamon/issues
82-85: Fix list indentation for consistency.The unordered list items should use consistent indentation according to markdown standards.
Thank you for considering contributing to Stamon! Contributions are welcome, including: - - **New Issues**: Feature requests, bug reports, questions, ideas, and more. - - **Pull Requests**: Documentation updates, code improvements, new features, etc. +- **New Issues**: Feature requests, bug reports, questions, ideas, and more. +- **Pull Requests**: Documentation updates, code improvements, new features, etc.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~82-~82: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 8 exclamation marks for a text that’s 2098 characters long)
Context: ...u for considering contributing to Stamon! Contributions are welcome, including: ...(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)
🪛 Markdownlint
84-84: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
85-85: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
94-100: LGTM! Clear roadmap with well-organized tasks.Consider removing the extra blank line at the end of the section for consistency.
- [ ] Add more monitoring types (e.g. DNS, TCP, docker) - [ ] Add support for custom alert thresholds -
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
README.md
62-62: null
Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
84-84: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation
(MD007, ul-indent)
85-85: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation
(MD007, ul-indent)
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[style] ~82-~82: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 8 exclamation marks for a text that’s 2098 characters long)
Context: ...u for considering contributing to Stamon! Contributions are welcome, including: ...
(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
README.md (4)
15-15: LGTM! Good improvement to the Docker badge.
Adding the sort=semver parameter ensures proper semantic version sorting in the badge display.
31-31: LGTM! Good addition to set expectations.
The italicized note about upcoming features aligns well with the newly added roadmap section.
57-57: LGTM! Improved readability.
The added comma enhances the readability of the Docker instructions.
103-103: LGTM! Clear and properly formatted license statement.
Summary by CodeRabbit