Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: do not remove preemptionPolicy in patcher when not present #1246

Merged

Conversation

HHK1
Copy link
Contributor

@HHK1 HHK1 commented Apr 29, 2021

Introduced a bug in 3090b2a. I
incorrectly assumed the preemptionPolicy was always set to a default on
pods, which is not the case in K8s versions prior to 1.19.

Introduced a bug in 3090b2a. I
incorrectly assumed the preemptionPolicy was always set to a default on
pods, which is not the case in K8s versions prior to 1.19.
Copy link
Contributor

@jrj-d jrj-d left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

Copy link
Collaborator

@liyinan926 liyinan926 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@liyinan926 liyinan926 merged commit 769f93f into kubeflow:master Apr 29, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants