Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add docker build to github action #1415

Merged

Conversation

TomHellier
Copy link
Contributor

@TomHellier TomHellier commented Dec 1, 2021

https://travis-ci.org stopped building code in June, so this should be removed. Github actions does the same and more anyway.

Adding docker build into github actions, it would be good if this repository could move to use that as its docker container publishing method, as then all CI will be managed by one system.

The helm chart shouldn't default to use the "latest" docker container, as that hasn't been build since May 19th anyway, I've reverted this back to use the chart appVersion (it was using this previously)
Fixes:
#1403
#1372

@TomHellier TomHellier force-pushed the test-build-docker-in-github-action branch 23 times, most recently from 0e486ce to 3885130 Compare December 1, 2021 18:26
Add a docker build into the github CI, even if we don't use it, and also
stop using latest as the default container version, as it is clearly wrong, and
the latest tag hasn't been updated in a long time.

travis-ci.org has stopped building the code for this repository as well, so we should
focus on github workflows. Ideally we'd move the building of the docker container into
github as well because then at least all CI is managed in one place.

Signed-off-by: Tom Hellier <me@tomhellier.com>
@TomHellier TomHellier force-pushed the test-build-docker-in-github-action branch from 3885130 to 775d129 Compare December 1, 2021 18:35
@TomHellier
Copy link
Contributor Author

TomHellier commented Dec 1, 2021

It looks like the e2e integration tests are broken, they're expecting files to exist which are not there anymore.

I have raised #1416 to address the problem at a later date, and commented out the section of the github action which attempts to run them.

@TomHellier TomHellier changed the title WIP: Add docker build to github action Add docker build to github action Dec 1, 2021
Copy link
Collaborator

@liyinan926 liyinan926 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR!

@liyinan926 liyinan926 merged commit 537bab5 into kubeflow:master Dec 2, 2021
jbhalodia-slack pushed a commit to jbhalodia-slack/spark-operator that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2024
Add a docker build into the github CI, even if we don't use it, and also
stop using latest as the default container version, as it is clearly wrong, and
the latest tag hasn't been updated in a long time.

travis-ci.org has stopped building the code for this repository as well, so we should
focus on github workflows. Ideally we'd move the building of the docker container into
github as well because then at least all CI is managed in one place.

Signed-off-by: Tom Hellier <me@tomhellier.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants