Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Device allocator should not use reserved dev names. #298

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2019

Conversation

anusha-ragunathan
Copy link
Contributor

@anusha-ragunathan anusha-ragunathan commented May 17, 2019

According to
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/device_naming.html,
on HVM instances, sda1 and xvda are reserved for root partition. Also,
the available block device range for xvd follow "/dev/xvd[b-c][a-z]"
pattern.

However commit 1ace946 violates the reserved device names and the naming
logic. This causes volume attachment issues. For example, for instances
where /dev/xvda is root partition, the driver tries to create a new
device with the same reserved name.
This change fixes the issue.

Testing:
Deployed Kube 1.14 cluster.
Update manifest.yaml with canary images for sidecards and new names for
API resources.
Tested new plugin and created sc, pvc (pv) and pod.
Volume attaches to node successfully. New device attached is
"/dev/xvdba" as expected.

Pod mounts volume and runs fine.

Fixes #292

Signed-off-by: Anusha Ragunathan anusha.ragunathan@docker.com

According to
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/device_naming.html,
on HVM instances, sda1 and xvda are reserved for root partition. Also,
the available block device range for xvd follow "/dev/xvd[b-c][a-z]"
pattern.

However commit 1ace946 violates the reserved device names and the naming
logic. This causes volume attachment issues. For example, for instances
where /dev/xvda is root partition, the driver tries to create a new
device with the same reserved name.
This change fixes the issue.

Testing:
Deployed Kube 1.14 cluster.
Update manifest.yaml with canary images for sidecards and new names for
API resources.
Tested new plugin and created sc, pvc (pv) and pod.
Volume attaches to node successfully. New device attached is
"/dev/xvdba" as expected.

Pod mounts volume and runs fine.

Issue kubernetes-sigs#292

Signed-off-by: Anusha Ragunathan <anusha.ragunathan@docker.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label May 17, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label May 17, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @anusha-ragunathan. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs or kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 17, 2019
@ddebroy
Copy link

ddebroy commented May 17, 2019

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels May 17, 2019
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 637

  • 1 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 71.12%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 628: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1086
Relevant Lines: 1527

💛 - Coveralls

@leakingtapan
Copy link
Contributor

Thx for the fix! I'm convinced starting from /dev/xvdba is the right way to go.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 17, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: anusha-ragunathan, leakingtapan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 17, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 493aa67 into kubernetes-sigs:master May 17, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Volumes attaching fails
5 participants