-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 579
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
✨ AWSManagedMachinePool (EKS managed nodegroup) support #1916
✨ AWSManagedMachinePool (EKS managed nodegroup) support #1916
Conversation
Hi @michaelbeaumont. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
318b512
to
012665b
Compare
012665b
to
52538ff
Compare
52538ff
to
52845d2
Compare
fbbdee4
to
ea02810
Compare
ea02810
to
4933769
Compare
/ok-to-test Let me know when to review |
4933769
to
2458b5d
Compare
@randomvariable I think it's a good time for a review, thanks! |
Cool, will take a look tomorrow |
74b9a33
to
70f4a20
Compare
I've just pushed support for scaling parameters |
} | ||
|
||
var allErrs field.ErrorList | ||
allErrs = append(allErrs, r.validateImmutable(oldPool)...) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Going to add a follow up for 0.6.2 to replace all this in our webhooks code with the use of kerrors.NewAggregate, so we don't run into #1996 again
@michaelbeaumont can you rebase this? This looks fine to go in. @richardcase if you want to lgtm after rebase, i'll approve. |
Will do 👍 |
70f4a20
to
3c6dab8
Compare
@@ -159,6 +161,24 @@ func main() { | |||
if feature.Gates.Enabled(feature.EKS) { | |||
setupLog.Info("enabling EKS controllers") | |||
|
|||
enableIAM := feature.Gates.Enabled(feature.EKSEnableIAM) | |||
allowAddRoles := feature.Gates.Enabled(feature.EKSAllowAddRoles) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this is used in the manager.....i'll create a new issue to remove it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Issue created #2001
Maybe squash commits but /lgtm |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: randomvariable The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Add EKS managed node groups support
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Closes #1785
Status:
Points of interest:
AWSLaunchTemplate
is introduced thereSpec.ProviderIDList
&Status.Replicas
and createsNodeRef
s