Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛Retry fetching user data from secretmanager if first request fails #4896

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2024

Conversation

alexander-demicev
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?
/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

When the bootstrap script runs, first call to the SecretsManager can fail in our environment. This PR adds a retry logic to the bootstrap script, if the first request fails it will retry again 10 times with a 10 second timeout.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist:

  • squashed commits
  • includes documentation
  • includes emojis
  • adds unit tests
  • adds or updates e2e tests

Release note:

Retry getting and deleting user data from SecretsManager in the bootstrap script in case of request failure.

Signed-off-by: Alexandr Demicev <alexandr.demicev@suse.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. labels Mar 27, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-priority size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 27, 2024
@alexander-demicev alexander-demicev changed the title Retry fetching user data from secretmanager if first request fails 🐛Retry fetching user data from secretmanager if first request fails Mar 27, 2024
@alexander-demicev
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e

@richardcase
Copy link
Member

/test ?

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@richardcase: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build-docker
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-test
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-verify

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-apidiff-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-blocking
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-clusterclass
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-conformance
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-conformance-with-ci-artifacts
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks-gc
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks-testing

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-apidiff-main
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build-docker
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-test
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-verify

In response to this:

/test ?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@richardcase
Copy link
Member

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

@alexander-demicev
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@faiq
Copy link
Contributor

faiq commented Apr 2, 2024

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 2, 2024
@richardcase
Copy link
Member

This change looks good to me and both sets of e2e are passing so from my side:

/approve
/cherry-pick release-2.4

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@richardcase: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-2.4 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

This change looks good to me and both sets of e2e are passing so from my side:

/approve
/cherry-pick release-2.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: richardcase

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 8, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit ad71a54 into kubernetes-sigs:main Apr 8, 2024
27 of 28 checks passed
@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@richardcase: new pull request created: #4911

In response to this:

This change looks good to me and both sets of e2e are passing so from my side:

/approve
/cherry-pick release-2.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants