Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce cluster template with Passt binding #213

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 1, 2022

Conversation

rhrazdil
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR adds template with VMs using Passt binding to pod network.
Passt featureGate is enabled in kubevirtci script and Passt recommended node configuration is performed on cluster-up.

NOTE: There is a commit bumping kubevirt to 0.59.0-alpha, because while kubevirt/kubevirt#8578 is merged in kubevirt release-0.58 branch, the change hasn't made it to v0.58.0 tag.

Lastly, an e2e test is added to exercise cluster creation with Passt binding.

Which issue this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close that issue when PR gets merged): fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release notes:

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Nov 29, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 29, 2022
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 29, 2022

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3581237415

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 51.459%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 3575808597: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 952
Relevant Lines: 1850

💛 - Coveralls

Radim Hrazdil added 5 commits November 29, 2022 12:34
Signed-off-by: Radim Hrazdil <rhrazdil@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Radim Hrazdil <rhrazdil@redhat.com>
So the template can be easily chosen by setting an env variable

Signed-off-by: Radim Hrazdil <rhrazdil@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Radim Hrazdil <rhrazdil@redhat.com>
Because v0.58.0 doesn't contain the fix
(kubevirt/kubevirt#8578)
for passt as it advertises.

Signed-off-by: Radim Hrazdil <rhrazdil@redhat.com>
@davidvossel
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. label Nov 29, 2022
Signed-off-by: Radim Hrazdil <rhrazdil@redhat.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@davidvossel davidvossel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: davidvossel, rhrazdil

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 1, 2022
@davidvossel
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 1, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 6512a4c into kubernetes-sigs:main Dec 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants