Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Cluster API to handle kubeadm v1beta2 configuration #3150

Closed
fabriziopandini opened this issue Jun 5, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

Update Cluster API to handle kubeadm v1beta2 configuration #3150

fabriziopandini opened this issue Jun 5, 2020 · 5 comments
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.

Comments

@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

User Story

As a user, I would like Cluster API to support Kubeadm v1beta2 config as part of KubeadmConfig and KubeadmControlPlane because the v1beta1 configuration is deprecated and will eventually lose support.

Detailed Description
Kubeadm is deprecated, and while there is not yet a date for removal, we should start to plan for starting to use v1beta2 in cluster API.

The issue is complicated by the fact that there is not yet agreement on k/k on how to handle component config upgrade and, as a consequence, kubeadm is not offering an automatic conversion func.
This is also relate to the work of moving kubeadm out of k/k and make it usable as a library (currently on hold 😞 ).

/kind feature

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Jun 5, 2020
@vincepri
Copy link
Member

vincepri commented Jun 8, 2020

/milestone Next

Unfortunately we'll have to tackle this item in v1alpha4 given that we might need breaking changes and/or a redesign of the current APIs.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the Next milestone Jun 8, 2020
@vincepri
Copy link
Member

Closing this in favor of #3150

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@vincepri: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Closing this in favor of #3150

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Arvinderpal
Copy link
Contributor

@vincepri

Closing this in favor of #3150

/close

@vincepri Did you mean to reference some other issue or was this closed by accident?

@vincepri
Copy link
Member

vincepri commented Jul 9, 2020

It should have been closed in favor of #2769

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants