Adding conflict resolution guidance for equivalent rules within a route

[robscott]

What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
/kind documentation

What this PR does / why we need it:
This adds conflict resolution guidance for equivalent rules within a route.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #613

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Adds conflict resolution guidance for equivalent rules within a route

/cc @stevesloka @youngnick @hbagdi

[k8s-ci-robot]

@robscott: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: stevesloka.

Note that only kubernetes-sigs members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
/kind documentation

What this PR does / why we need it:
This adds conflict resolution guidance for equivalent rules within a route.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #613

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Adds conflict resolution guidance for equivalent rules within a route

/cc @stevesloka @youngnick @hbagdi

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: robscott

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [robscott]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[hbagdi]

/lgtm

@youngnick had some thoughts here so let's wait for his review too.
/hold

[youngnick]

/lgtm

Yeah, I think the first-matching is slightly better than last-matching. Thanks for making this update @robscott!

[robscott]

/hold cancel