-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Service Catalog]: Pod Preset #162
Comments
@jessfraz can you update this feature request with more details? |
Yes sorry, is there a template for what details go here and what goes into the proposal? |
@jessfraz feel free to update the issue body (the new template is on the way) |
@jessfraz will it be alpha (or beta/stable) for 1.6? |
we are hoping for alpha
…On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:55 PM Ihor Dvoretskyi ***@***.***> wrote:
@jessfraz <https://github.com/jessfraz> will it be alpha (or beta/stable)
for 1.6?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#162 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABYNbB-S4_sQ9qqn1RBInscvC75TDEcdks5rgzhGgaJpZM4LcRTI>
.
|
@jessfraz This is likely not landing in 1.6, correct? |
@pwittrock we're hoping to get it into 1.6, yes. |
should probably update the text here with the new name |
Development complete and merged. Documentation in progress. |
The docs PR for this still needs a tech review. |
Any idea if this is going to hit beta in 1.7? |
@kuroneko25 features and code freeze deadlines are already passed, this feature is not targeting 1.7. |
In the sig-arch call yesterday they talked about moving PodPreset to the svc-cat repo and continuing the work over there. Not sure if this will make it for v1.8 or not since it will also require it to use initializers - and see this comment: kubernetes-retired/service-catalog#1041 (comment) |
@duglin @kubernetes/sig-service-catalog-feature-requests is it expected that this feature will be developed in a general Kubernetes scope (following the general timelines etc)? If not, feel free to close the feature request. |
PodPreset is going to be moved to the service catalog incubator project. |
@pwittrock Sorry for commenting on a closed thread but I'm struggling to find any information when podpreset will be in beta (thus GA on GKE), every thread stream I seem to follow is closed. Any ideas? |
Any updates on this? Are most Kubernetes APIs intended to stay in Alpha for almost 3 years? I'm not really sure if this feature has the momentum behind it to go into beta, but I know lots of cloud kubernetes environments (EKS, GKE, etc) won't enable it unless it does, and I'm really looking forward to using this feature in a bigger way. Let me know if anyone is still involved in this feature or if there's anything I can do to help! |
I just bumped into this feature and it looks to be very useful to me. Whats the plan around this? |
Add proposal for CSI certification suite
Description
Add a policy resource that allows loose coupling from services to the pods that consume them.
Proposal here: kubernetes/community#254
Progress Tracker
/pkg/apis/...
)@kubernetes/api
@kubernetes/docs
on docs PR@kubernetes/feature-reviewers
on this issue to get approval before checking this off- Updated walkthrough / tutorial in the docs repo: kubernetes/kubernetes.github.io
- cc
@kubernetes/docs
on docs PR- cc
@kubernetes/feature-reviewers
on this issue to get approval before checking this off@kubernetes/api
- cc
@kubernetes/feature-reviewers
on this issue to get approval before checking this off@kubernetes/docs
@kubernetes/feature-reviewers
on this issue to get approval before checking this offFEATURE_STATUS is used for feature tracking and to be updated by
@kubernetes/feature-reviewers
.FEATURE_STATUS: IN_DEVELOPMENT
More advice:
Design
@kubernetes/feature-reviewers
member, you can check this checkbox, and the reviewer will apply the "design-complete" label.Coding
and sometimes http://github.com/kubernetes/contrib, or other repos.
@kubernetes/feature-reviewers
and they willcheck that the code matches the proposed feature and design, and that everything is done, and that there is adequate
testing. They won't do detailed code review: that already happened when your PRs were reviewed.
When that is done, you can check this box and the reviewer will apply the "code-complete" label.
Docs
@kubernetes/docs
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: