Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Quota by Priority #612

Closed
justaugustus opened this issue Aug 22, 2018 · 21 comments
Closed

Quota by Priority #612

justaugustus opened this issue Aug 22, 2018 · 21 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. stage/beta Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Beta status tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team

Comments

@justaugustus
Copy link
Member

Feature Description

  • One-line feature description (can be used as a release note):
  • Primary contact (assignee): @bsalamat
  • Responsible SIGs: @kubernetes/sig-scheduling-feature-requests, @kubernetes/sig-node-feature-requests
  • Design proposal link (community repo):
  • Link to e2e and/or unit tests:
  • Reviewer(s) - (for LGTM) recommend having 2+ reviewers (at least one from code-area OWNERS file) agreed to review. Reviewers from multiple companies preferred: @davidopp, @derekwaynecarr, @erictune, @k82cn, @timothysc, @wojtek-t @dchen1107
  • Approver (likely from SIG/area to which feature belongs): @davidopp
  • Feature target (which target equals to which milestone):
    • Alpha release target: ???
    • Beta release target: 1.12
    • Stable release target: ???

rel: #268
/sig scheduling node
/kind feature
/stage beta
/milestone v1.12
/assign @bsalamat

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added stage/beta Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Beta status sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. labels Aug 22, 2018
@justaugustus justaugustus added this to the v1.12 milestone Aug 22, 2018
@justaugustus
Copy link
Member Author

@bsalamat @kubernetes/sig-scheduling-feature-requests @kubernetes/sig-node-feature-requests --
Any update on docs status for this feature? Are we still planning to land it for 1.12?
At this point, code freeze is upon us, and docs are due on 9/7 (2 days).
If we don't here anything back regarding this feature ASAP, we'll need to remove it from the milestone.

cc: @zparnold @jimangel @tfogo

@bsalamat
Copy link
Member

bsalamat commented Sep 7, 2018

This feature is implemented and docs are also written.

cc/ @vikaschoudhary16

@bsalamat
Copy link
Member

bsalamat commented Sep 7, 2018

And the doc is updated for 1.12.

@bsalamat
Copy link
Member

bsalamat commented Sep 7, 2018

The doc change that I sent above is actually for 1.11. I am going to send a PR to update the version tag in the doc.

@justaugustus
Copy link
Member Author

@bsalamat please also link it here, so we can track.

@bsalamat
Copy link
Member

bsalamat commented Sep 7, 2018

@justaugustus Done

@ameukam
Copy link
Member

ameukam commented Oct 5, 2018

Hi folks,
Kubernetes 1.13 is going to be a 'stable' release since the cycle is only 10 weeks. We encourage no big alpha features and only consider adding this feature if you have a high level of confidence it will make code slush by 11/09. Are there plans for this enhancement to graduate to alpha/beta/stable within the 1.13 release cycle? If not, can you please remove it from the 1.12 milestone or add it to 1.13?

We are also now encouraging that every new enhancement aligns with a KEP. If a KEP has been created, please link to it in the original post. Please take the opportunity to develop a KEP.

@kacole2 kacole2 added the tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team label Oct 5, 2018
@yastij
Copy link
Member

yastij commented Oct 5, 2018

@ameukam - this is already in beta, @bsalamat do we plan to move this to GA in 1.13 ?

@bsalamat
Copy link
Member

bsalamat commented Oct 5, 2018

No, we don't. We should probably target 1.14 for GA of pod priority and quota by priority if things go well.

@kacole2
Copy link

kacole2 commented Oct 5, 2018

thanks for the update!
/milestone clear

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed this from the v1.12 milestone Oct 5, 2018
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 3, 2019
@bsalamat
Copy link
Member

bsalamat commented Jan 4, 2019

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 4, 2019
@claurence
Copy link

@bsalamat - Hello, enhancements lead here - checking to see if there is any work being planned for the 1.14 release? Enhancements freeze is 1/29 and we want all enhancements to have a KEP. Thanks

@bsalamat
Copy link
Member

@claurence This is not a new enhancement. It is already implemented and is in Beta.

@claurence
Copy link

ok so then no plans to move to stable in 1.14? Thanks.

@kacole2
Copy link

kacole2 commented Apr 12, 2019

I'm the Enhancement Lead for 1.15. Is this feature going to be graduating alpha/beta/stable stages in 1.15? Please let me know so it can be tracked properly and added to the spreadsheet.

Once coding begins, please list all relevant k/k PRs in this issue so they can be tracked properly.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 11, 2019
@rbitia
Copy link

rbitia commented Jul 11, 2019

Hi @bsalamat , I'm the 1.16 Enhancement Shadow. Is this feature going to be graduating alpha/beta/stable stages in 1.16? Please let me know so it can be added to the 1.16 Tracking Spreadsheet. If it's not graduating, I will remove it from the milestone and change the tracked label.

Once coding begins or if it already has, please list all relevant k/k PRs in this issue so they can be tracked properly.

Milestone dates are Enhancement Freeze 7/30 and Code Freeze 8/29.

Thank you.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Aug 10, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. stage/beta Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Beta status tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants