Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does not work if workers are in different subnet. #282

Closed
manishrajkarnikar opened this issue May 23, 2018 · 6 comments
Closed

Does not work if workers are in different subnet. #282

manishrajkarnikar opened this issue May 23, 2018 · 6 comments
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@manishrajkarnikar
Copy link

manishrajkarnikar commented May 23, 2018

I have workers spanning different subnet for security reasons. I see following error during the creation of unmanaged instance group. As a result, it cannot add any instance in the group

Requeuing "default/zoneprinter" due to error: [googleapi: Error 400: Resource 'projects/xxxx/zones/us-central1-b/instances/k8s-ig--xxxxxx' is expected to be in the subnetwork 'projects/xxxx/regions/us-central1/subnetworks/app-hosting-us-central1' but is in the subnetwork 'projects/xxxx/regions/us-central1/subnetworks/platform-us-central1'., wrongSubnetwork ....] (ingresses)

@manishrajkarnikar manishrajkarnikar changed the title Does not work with multiple workers in different subnet. Does not work if workers are in different subnet. May 23, 2018
@nicksardo
Copy link
Contributor

Can you describe your setup? Are you using multi-cluster or single cluster ingress?

@manishrajkarnikar
Copy link
Author

@nicksardo I am using single cluster. But my masters are in different subnet than the workers.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 18, 2018
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Oct 18, 2018
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants