-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 303
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for Access Logs in BackendConfig #1041
Conversation
Hi @skmatti. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@skmatti: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: minhan. Note that only kubernetes members, repo collaborators and people who have commented on this issue/PR can be assigned. Additionally, issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/assign @freehan |
bbf2c32
to
f61d048
Compare
/ok-to-test |
Is this still needed? |
Yes, this will go into v1.9.0. Older versions do not need this as a feature. But, starting v1.9.0, users can configure access logs as they like. |
f61d048
to
bf6d153
Compare
bf6d153
to
5b3a72f
Compare
5b3a72f
to
fde6725
Compare
logConfig := &composite.BackendServiceLogConfig{ | ||
Enable: sp.BackendConfig.Spec.Logging.Enable, | ||
} | ||
if !sp.BackendConfig.Spec.Logging.Enable || sp.BackendConfig.Spec.Logging.SampleRate == nil { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you need to check if Logging is nil?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is checked in caller function. Added a comment that this is assumed to be not nil. Would it be cleaner if I explicitly include a check here as well?.
fde6725
to
662b08c
Compare
662b08c
to
7fcf338
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: freehan, skmatti The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Cherrypick #1041[Add support for Access Logs in BackendConfig] into release-1.9
No description provided.