Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignore deletion timestamp when ensuring NEG CR #1199

Merged

Conversation

swetharepakula
Copy link
Member

  • svcPortMap is the source of truth, so continue neg creation and
    syncing even if corresponding NEG CR has a deletion timestamp

 - svcPortMap is the source of truth, so continue neg creation and
 syncing even if corresponding NEG CR has a deletion timestamp
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jul 30, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @swetharepakula. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jul 30, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from bowei and MrHohn July 30, 2020 23:24
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 30, 2020
@swetharepakula
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @freehan

Copy link
Contributor

@freehan freehan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve
/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jul 31, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: freehan, swetharepakula

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 31, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 332d3e0 into kubernetes:master Jul 31, 2020
@swetharepakula swetharepakula deleted the refactor-neg-crd-manager branch August 1, 2020 01:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants