Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Cherrypick #1774 in release-1.19] Fix RBS crash, when getting NodePorts for Services without ports #1775

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 8, 2022

Conversation

cezarygerard
Copy link
Contributor

Fix RBS crash, when getting NodePorts for Services without ports

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 8, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from freehan and thockin August 8, 2022 14:12
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 8, 2022
@cezarygerard
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @swetharepakula

@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ func (lc *L4NetLBController) hasForwardingRuleAnnotation(svc *v1.Service, frName

// isRBSBasedService checks if service has either RBS annotation, finalizer or RBSForwardingRule
func (lc *L4NetLBController) isRBSBasedService(svc *v1.Service) bool {
if svc == nil {
if !utils.IsLoadBalancerServiceType(svc) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this change necessary? Doesn't the annotation and finalizer check afterwards cover all the cases? Is this why non RBS services were causing issues?

Copy link
Member

@swetharepakula swetharepakula left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 8, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cezarygerard, swetharepakula

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [cezarygerard,swetharepakula]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit eb62fa7 into kubernetes:release-1.19 Aug 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants