Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add check for endpoint count is zero #1849

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 24, 2022
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
9 changes: 9 additions & 0 deletions pkg/neg/syncers/transaction.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -363,9 +363,14 @@ func (s *transactionSyncer) ensureNetworkEndpointGroups() error {
// endpiontPodMap removes the duplicated endpoints, and dupCount stores the number of duplicated it removed
// and we compare the endpoint counts with duplicates
// 2. There is at least one endpoint in endpointData with missing nodeName
// 3. The endpoint count from endpointData or the one from endpointPodMap is 0
func (s *transactionSyncer) invalidEndpointInfo(eds []negtypes.EndpointsData, endpointPodMap negtypes.EndpointPodMap, dupCount int) bool {
// Endpoint count from EndpointPodMap
countFromPodMap := len(endpointPodMap) + dupCount
if countFromPodMap == 0 {
s.logger.Info("Detected endpoint count from endpointPodMap going to zero", "endpointPodMap", endpointPodMap)
return true
}

// Endpoint count from EndpointData
countFromEndpointData := 0
Expand All @@ -379,6 +384,10 @@ func (s *transactionSyncer) invalidEndpointInfo(eds []negtypes.EndpointsData, en
}
}
}
if countFromEndpointData == 0 {
s.logger.Info("Detected endpoint count from endpointData going to zero", "endpointData", eds)
return true
}

if countFromEndpointData != countFromPodMap {
s.logger.Info("Detected error when comparing endpoint counts", "endpointData", eds, "endpointPodMap", endpointPodMap, "dupCount", dupCount)
Expand Down
255 changes: 237 additions & 18 deletions pkg/neg/syncers/transaction_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1429,7 +1429,7 @@ func TestInvalidEndpointInfo(t *testing.T) {
testPodName3 := "pod3"
testPodName4 := "pod4"

endpointPodMap := map[negtypes.NetworkEndpoint]types.NamespacedName{
testEndpointPodMap := map[negtypes.NetworkEndpoint]types.NamespacedName{
{
IP: testIP1,
Port: "80",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1465,10 +1465,11 @@ func TestInvalidEndpointInfo(t *testing.T) {
}

testCases := []struct {
desc string
endpointsData []negtypes.EndpointsData
dupCount int
expect bool
desc string
endpointsData []negtypes.EndpointsData
endpointPodMap map[negtypes.NetworkEndpoint]types.NamespacedName
dupCount int
expect bool
}{
{
desc: "counts equal, endpointData has no duplicated endpoints",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1538,8 +1539,9 @@ func TestInvalidEndpointInfo(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
dupCount: 0,
expect: false,
endpointPodMap: testEndpointPodMap,
dupCount: 0,
expect: false,
},
{
desc: "counts equal, endpointData has duplicated endpoints",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1618,8 +1620,9 @@ func TestInvalidEndpointInfo(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
dupCount: 1,
expect: false,
endpointPodMap: testEndpointPodMap,
dupCount: 1,
expect: false,
},
{
desc: "counts not equal, endpointData has no duplicated endpoints",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1680,8 +1683,9 @@ func TestInvalidEndpointInfo(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
dupCount: 0,
expect: true,
endpointPodMap: testEndpointPodMap,
dupCount: 0,
expect: true,
},
{
desc: "counts not equal, endpointData has duplicated endpoints",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1751,8 +1755,9 @@ func TestInvalidEndpointInfo(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
dupCount: 1,
expect: true,
endpointPodMap: testEndpointPodMap,
dupCount: 1,
expect: true,
},
{
desc: "no missing nodeNames",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1822,8 +1827,9 @@ func TestInvalidEndpointInfo(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
dupCount: 0,
expect: false,
endpointPodMap: testEndpointPodMap,
dupCount: 0,
expect: false,
},
{
desc: "at least one endpoint is missing a nodeName",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1893,14 +1899,227 @@ func TestInvalidEndpointInfo(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
dupCount: 0,
expect: true,
endpointPodMap: testEndpointPodMap,
dupCount: 0,
expect: true,
},
{
desc: "endpointData has zero endpoint",
endpointsData: []negtypes.EndpointsData{
{
Meta: &metav1.ObjectMeta{
Name: testServiceName + "-1",
Namespace: testServiceNamespace,
},
Ports: []negtypes.PortData{
{
Name: testPortName,
Port: port80,
},
},
Addresses: []negtypes.AddressData{},
},
{
Meta: &metav1.ObjectMeta{
Name: testServiceName + "-2",
Namespace: testServiceNamespace,
},
Ports: []negtypes.PortData{
{
Name: testPortName,
Port: port81,
},
},
Addresses: []negtypes.AddressData{},
},
},
endpointPodMap: testEndpointPodMap,
dupCount: 0,
expect: true,
},
{
desc: "endpointPodMap has zero endpoint",
endpointsData: []negtypes.EndpointsData{
{
Meta: &metav1.ObjectMeta{
Name: testServiceName + "-1",
Namespace: testServiceNamespace,
},
Ports: []negtypes.PortData{
{
Name: testPortName,
Port: port80,
},
},
Addresses: []negtypes.AddressData{
{
TargetRef: &corev1.ObjectReference{
Namespace: testServiceNamespace,
Name: testPodName1,
},
NodeName: &instance1,
Addresses: []string{testIP1},
Ready: true,
},
{
TargetRef: &corev1.ObjectReference{
Namespace: testServiceNamespace,
Name: testPodName2,
},
NodeName: &instance1,
Addresses: []string{testIP2},
Ready: true,
},
},
},
{
Meta: &metav1.ObjectMeta{
Name: testServiceName + "-2",
Namespace: testServiceNamespace,
},
Ports: []negtypes.PortData{
{
Name: testPortName,
Port: port81,
},
},
Addresses: []negtypes.AddressData{
{
TargetRef: &corev1.ObjectReference{
Namespace: testServiceNamespace,
Name: testPodName3,
},
NodeName: &instance2,
Addresses: []string{testIP3},
Ready: true,
},
{
TargetRef: &corev1.ObjectReference{
Namespace: testServiceNamespace,
Name: testPodName4,
},
NodeName: &instance4,
Addresses: []string{testIP4},
Ready: true,
},
},
},
},
endpointPodMap: map[negtypes.NetworkEndpoint]types.NamespacedName{},
dupCount: 0,
expect: true,
},
{
desc: "endpointData and endpointPodMap both have zero endpoint",
endpointsData: []negtypes.EndpointsData{
{
Meta: &metav1.ObjectMeta{
Name: testServiceName + "-1",
Namespace: testServiceNamespace,
},
Ports: []negtypes.PortData{
{
Name: testPortName,
Port: port80,
},
},
Addresses: []negtypes.AddressData{},
},
{
Meta: &metav1.ObjectMeta{
Name: testServiceName + "-2",
Namespace: testServiceNamespace,
},
Ports: []negtypes.PortData{
{
Name: testPortName,
Port: port81,
},
},
Addresses: []negtypes.AddressData{},
},
},
endpointPodMap: map[negtypes.NetworkEndpoint]types.NamespacedName{},
dupCount: 0,
expect: true,
},
{
desc: "endpointData and endpointPodMap both have non-zero endpoints",
endpointsData: []negtypes.EndpointsData{
{
Meta: &metav1.ObjectMeta{
Name: testServiceName + "-1",
Namespace: testServiceNamespace,
},
Ports: []negtypes.PortData{
{
Name: testPortName,
Port: port80,
},
},
Addresses: []negtypes.AddressData{
{
TargetRef: &corev1.ObjectReference{
Namespace: testServiceNamespace,
Name: testPodName1,
},
NodeName: &instance1,
Addresses: []string{testIP1},
Ready: true,
},
{
TargetRef: &corev1.ObjectReference{
Namespace: testServiceNamespace,
Name: testPodName2,
},
NodeName: &instance1,
Addresses: []string{testIP2},
Ready: true,
},
},
},
{
Meta: &metav1.ObjectMeta{
Name: testServiceName + "-2",
Namespace: testServiceNamespace,
},
Ports: []negtypes.PortData{
{
Name: testPortName,
Port: port81,
},
},
Addresses: []negtypes.AddressData{
{
TargetRef: &corev1.ObjectReference{
Namespace: testServiceNamespace,
Name: testPodName3,
},
NodeName: &instance2,
Addresses: []string{testIP3},
Ready: true,
},
{
TargetRef: &corev1.ObjectReference{
Namespace: testServiceNamespace,
Name: testPodName4,
},
NodeName: &instance4,
Addresses: []string{testIP4},
Ready: true,
},
},
},
},
endpointPodMap: testEndpointPodMap,
dupCount: 0,
expect: false,
},
}

for _, tc := range testCases {
sawsa307 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
t.Run(tc.desc, func(t *testing.T) {
if got := transactionSyncer.invalidEndpointInfo(tc.endpointsData, endpointPodMap, tc.dupCount); got != tc.expect {
if got := transactionSyncer.invalidEndpointInfo(tc.endpointsData, tc.endpointPodMap, tc.dupCount); got != tc.expect {
t.Errorf("invalidEndpointInfo() = %t, expected %t", got, tc.expect)
}
})
Expand Down