Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Concurrently process deletion candidates within NEG Garbage Collector #1976

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 8, 2023

Conversation

gauravkghildiyal
Copy link
Member

/assign @swetharepakula

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Feb 28, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Feb 28, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @gauravkghildiyal. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 28, 2023
@gauravkghildiyal gauravkghildiyal force-pushed the concurrent-neg-gc branch 4 times, most recently from 4663faa to 4111167 Compare February 28, 2023 19:03
@swetharepakula
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Mar 1, 2023
Copy link
Member

@swetharepakula swetharepakula left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

few nits, otherwise LGTM

// deleteNegOrReportErr will attempt to delete the specified NEG resource in the cloud. If an error
// occurs, it will report an error as an event on the given CR. If an error does occur, false will
// be returned to indicate that the CR should not be deleted.
deleteNegOrReportErr := func(name, zone string, cr *negv1beta1.ServiceNetworkEndpointGroup) bool {
deleteNegOrReportErr := func(name, zone string, svcNegCR *negv1beta1.ServiceNetworkEndpointGroup) bool {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: pull this out into its own function as we will be recreating this function once per service and there is no special context in the function itself.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure! Done.

if err := deleteSvcNegCR(manager.svcNegClient, cr, manager.logger); err != nil {
errList = append(errList, err)
// Verify that the NEG is still not wanted before deleting the CR. Mitigates the possibility of the race
// condition mentioned above
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: since the comment is now in a different function, point to the preceding function

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added.

Copy link
Member

@swetharepakula swetharepakula left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 8, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gauravkghildiyal, swetharepakula

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 8, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 5bd241d into kubernetes:master Mar 8, 2023
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2023
…elease-1.22

[Cherry pick #1976] Concurrently process deletion candidates within NEG Garbage Collector
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants