-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 303
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remove loop from flush(). start/stop informers depending on k8s master #580
Conversation
Hi @agau4779. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/assign @rramkumar1 |
/ok-to-test |
@@ -116,6 +116,15 @@ func (sm *StatusManager) startInformer() { | |||
cmInformer.AddEventHandler(cache.ResourceEventHandlerFuncs{ | |||
UpdateFunc: func(old, cur interface{}) { | |||
curCm := cur.(*v1.ConfigMap) | |||
upgradeTs := curCm.Data[masterUpgradingKey] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Discussed offline. Don't need this.
@@ -152,66 +161,77 @@ func (sm *StatusManager) putStatus(key string, status IngressStability) { | |||
sm.cm.Data[key] = string(status) | |||
} | |||
|
|||
func (sm *StatusManager) setMasterUpgrading(ts string) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Discussed offline. Don't need this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Disregard comment that we don't need this. We do.
Can we call this updateLocalConfigMap() though? And when you use it, just update the whole config map rather than one key.
cmd/e2e-test/upgrade_test.go
Outdated
@@ -88,12 +88,6 @@ func TestUpgrade(t *testing.T) { | |||
} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
// While k8s master is upgrading, it will return a connection refused |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We still want this.
pkg/e2e/sandbox.go
Outdated
@@ -87,9 +87,3 @@ func (s *Sandbox) PutStatus(status IngressStability) { | |||
func (s *Sandbox) MasterUpgraded() bool { | |||
return s.f.statusManager.masterUpgraded() | |||
} | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We still want this.
pkg/e2e/status.go
Outdated
@@ -217,6 +174,20 @@ func (sm *StatusManager) flush() { | |||
updatedCm.Data = make(map[string]string) | |||
} | |||
|
|||
// If master is in the process of upgrading, we exit early and turn off the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How come this was moved back down? Where it was originally was fine.
/assign bowei |
3518750
to
3240156
Compare
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: agau4779, rramkumar1 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.