-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 303
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add cloud pointer to neg linker and backend syncer #811
Conversation
Hi @spencerhance. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
f5f75ef
to
edae1c0
Compare
/ok-to-test @spencerhance looks like this needs a rebase |
edae1c0
to
5752113
Compare
@rramkumar1 thanks, just fixed it now |
@@ -43,11 +44,13 @@ var _ Syncer = (*backendSyncer)(nil) | |||
func NewBackendSyncer( | |||
backendPool Pool, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe I'm missing something but doesn't seem like backendPool is used anymore? Can we remove it if that is the case?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We definitely still use it in the syncer
@@ -34,11 +36,13 @@ var _ Linker = (*negLinker)(nil) | |||
func NewNEGLinker( | |||
backendPool Pool, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same comment as above regarding backendPool not being used any longer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We only use it in the neg linker test
/assign @bowei |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
@@ -43,11 +44,13 @@ var _ Syncer = (*backendSyncer)(nil) | |||
func NewBackendSyncer( | |||
backendPool Pool, | |||
healthChecker healthchecks.HealthChecker, | |||
namer *utils.Namer) Syncer { | |||
namer *utils.Namer, | |||
cloud *gce.Cloud) Syncer { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[go style] we don't break line for args like this
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bowei, spencerhance The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Remove BackendPool downcast by adding a cloud pointer to the neg linker and backend syncer