Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor ingress key function and finalizer into separate package #883

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2019

Conversation

skmatti
Copy link
Contributor

@skmatti skmatti commented Oct 2, 2019

Refactors some of ingress key utility functions and finalizer logic to a separate package so these can be accessed by namer package without import cycle. A subsequent PR #860 with utilization of these refactored functions inside namer package.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Oct 2, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @skmatti. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 2, 2019
@skmatti
Copy link
Contributor Author

skmatti commented Oct 2, 2019

/assign @MrHohn @freehan

@MrHohn
Copy link
Member

MrHohn commented Oct 2, 2019

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Oct 2, 2019
)

var (
KeyFunc = cache.DeletionHandlingMetaNamespaceKeyFunc
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about we organize it this way:

KeyFunc is used only used to handle items in workqueue

After the initial process of ingress, everything is handled by IngressKeyFunc.

So you do not need the ToIngressKey function as middleman?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The idea is to generate same key as that of Ingress Store and preserve backward compatibility. In theory, both KeyFunc and IngressKeyFunc should return same value with a valid Ingress. Some of the edge cases where they output different values is when namespace is empty. KeyFunc returns <name> where as IngressKeyFunc returns /<name>.

I changed the names a bit so they are less confusing and also added some description about why we need two separate functions as explained here.

KeyFunc = cache.DeletionHandlingMetaNamespaceKeyFunc
)

// ToString returns ingress key for given ingress.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ToString returns namespaced name string of a given ingress

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

Copy link
Contributor

@freehan freehan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

leave it for a 2nd pair of eyes.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 3, 2019
Copy link
Member

@MrHohn MrHohn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@MrHohn
Copy link
Member

MrHohn commented Oct 3, 2019

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: MrHohn, skmatti

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 3, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit a52c0ed into kubernetes:master Oct 3, 2019
@skmatti skmatti deleted the common-pkg branch October 3, 2019 17:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants