-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Chart: Implement controller.admissionWebhooks.service.servicePort
.
#11931
Conversation
|
Welcome @ralgozino! |
Hi @ralgozino. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-ingress-nginx canceled.
|
/triage accepted Thanks for your contribution! I'll review it later, hopefully! 🙂 |
thank you @Gacko This is my first contribution to the project, please let me know if I missed anything and I'll happily fix it :-) Have a nice day! |
464c048
to
a2116a0
Compare
controller.admissionWebhooks.service.servicePort
.
a2116a0
to
708df99
Compare
/ok-to-test |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Gacko, ralgozino The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Ciao! Since you enabled the option for maintainers to edit your fork, I implemented a few improvements, mainly around the tests, and rebased your branch. Apart from that, your proposal looks good and is ready to be merged. Mille grazie e buona serata! |
/cherry-pick release-1.10 |
/cherry-pick release-1.11 |
@Gacko: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.10 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@Gacko: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.11 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@Gacko: new pull request created: #11933 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@Gacko: new pull request created: #11934 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Thank you for the feedback. I saw your changes, they make a lot of sense. Buona giornata and see you in the next PR :-) |
What this PR does / why we need it:
While the chart values.yaml provides a controller.admissionWebhooks.service.servicePort option, its value was being ignored by the chart template.
This PR changes the template to use the value for the admission webhook service port in the Service definition and in the corresponding ValidatingWebhookConfiguration instead of ignoring it.
The PR also adds some Helm unit tests for this value.
Types of changes
Which issue/s this PR fixes
How Has This Been Tested?
make kind-e2e-chart-tests
locally (mac M1): all tests passedhelm unittest charts/ingress-nginx -d
locally (mac M1): all tests passed.Checklist: