-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix: fillout missing health check timeout on health check. #4185
Fix: fillout missing health check timeout on health check. #4185
Conversation
Welcome @Colstuwjx! |
Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). 📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA. It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Hi @Colstuwjx. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
I signed it |
/assign @aledbf |
/ok-to-test |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4185 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 57.46% 57.74% +0.27%
==========================================
Files 87 87
Lines 6534 6480 -54
==========================================
- Hits 3755 3742 -13
+ Misses 2344 2307 -37
+ Partials 435 431 -4
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
internal/nginx/main.go
Outdated
} | ||
u.RegisterLocation(statusLocation, StatusSocket) | ||
|
||
return &http.Client{ | ||
Transport: u, | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
func getOrSetUnixSocketClient() *http.Client { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please remove this and just use buildUnixSocketClient(HealthCheckTimeout).Post(.....
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why? the socketClient
is gloabl variable in the previous, call buildUnixSocketClient
at each request would initial one client per request, it costs memory which is valueless.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, things cleared, and I will appreciate if you share with me the reason about code in this way :) @aledbf
/retest |
@Colstuwjx please squash the commits |
fd0aa62
to
18da0b3
Compare
@aledbf It seems that all things cleared, let me know if there are any issues left. |
18da0b3
to
b28577a
Compare
/lgtm |
@Colstuwjx thanks! |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: aledbf, Colstuwjx The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR fixes the missing flag argument HealthCheckTimeout which is removed in this commit by mistake, and keeps the default timeout settings ( 10s ) where it's NOT health check related calls.
Which issue this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close that issue when PR gets merged): fixes #Special notes for your reviewer: