Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

after creating a cluster the command it gave at the end to apply it was wrong. #5967

Closed
phynias opened this issue Oct 18, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@phynias
Copy link

phynias commented Oct 18, 2018

1. What kops version are you running? The command kops version, will display
this information.

Version 1.10.0
2. What Kubernetes version are you running? kubectl version will print the
version if a cluster is running or provide the Kubernetes version specified as
a kops flag.

v1.12.0
3. What cloud provider are you using?
aws
4. What commands did you run? What is the simplest way to reproduce this issue?

kops create cluster \
--node-count=2 \
--node-size=t2.medium \
--zones=us-west-1b \
--name=${KOPS_CLUSTER_NAME

which worked fine and then told me at the end:

...
Finally configure your cluster with: kops update cluster prod-k8s.mine.com --yes

when i run that i get:

Found multiple arguments which look like a cluster name
	"prod-k8s.mine.com" (via flag)
	"prod-k8s.mine.com" (as argument)

This often happens if you specify an argument to a boolean flag without using =
For example: use `--bastion=true` or `--bastion`, not `--bastion true`


Cannot specify cluster via --name and positional argument

it then worked when i added --name to the command.

not sure why it gave me a command to run that was wrong.

@huang-jy
Copy link

Because there are two ways you can pass this to kops -- one is using an environment variable (which I think is the way the devs do it - hence the command returned at the end of the run doesn't have it) and the other is using the --name switch (which I do)

In short, if you have the cluster name included on an environment variable, then kops doesn't need the --name switch, if you don't have the environment variable, then you need the --name switch.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 21, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Feb 20, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants