-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
let kubectl label use PATCH instead of PUT #15651
Conversation
Labelling this PR as size/M |
GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit 873c1d28e3b1082cf0b3aff38ba9dfbd950a0f67. |
@k8s-bot test this please |
GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit 873c1d28e3b1082cf0b3aff38ba9dfbd950a0f67. |
873c1d2
to
b5a3ab6
Compare
PR changed after LGTM, removing LGTM. |
GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit b5a3ab6. |
add back "lgtm" since it's a rebase |
@k8s-oncall @bgrant0607 it seems the merge bot is not working. Shall I go ahead merging this? |
@caesarxuchao It's up to the build cop. |
let kubectl label use PATCH instead of PUT
…ODO. All dependencies according to kubernetes#15651 (comment) are merged
Similar to #15597, this PR lets
kubectl label
use PATCH instead of PUTFix #15333
We can revert the retry function introduced to test-cmd.sh in #15325 after this one and #15597 are merged.
@bgrant0607 @janetkuo @jlowdermilk