Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add spec.Name() to the configmap GetVolumeName() #28534

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 7, 2016

Conversation

asalkeld
Copy link

@asalkeld asalkeld commented Jul 6, 2016

This is to base the name on the volume not just on the
source configMap. If you have 2 volumes that both have the same
configMap as a source, the volume is see as being in the attached
state (it's state is looked up based on GetVolumeName()).

Fixes #28502

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. release-note-label-needed labels Jul 6, 2016
@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jul 6, 2016

GCE e2e build/test failed for commit 4c17e9638ed2ab2c520d952a88864efbc3bfbd95.

Please reference the list of currently known flakes when examining this failure. If you request a re-test, you must reference the issue describing the flake.

This is to base the name on the volume not just on the
source configMap. If you have 2 volumes that both have the same
configMap as a source, the volume is see as being in the attached
state (it's state is looked up based on GetVolumeName()).

See bug kubernetes#28502
@asalkeld asalkeld force-pushed the configmap-multi-ref branch from 4c17e96 to d7150bf Compare July 6, 2016 14:40
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 6, 2016
@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jul 6, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit d7150bf.

@ncdc
Copy link
Member

ncdc commented Jul 6, 2016

cc @pmorie

@saad-ali saad-ali added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed release-note-label-needed labels Jul 6, 2016
@saad-ali
Copy link
Member

saad-ali commented Jul 6, 2016

LGTM Thanks @asalkeld

@saad-ali
Copy link
Member

saad-ali commented Jul 6, 2016

We should cherry pick this for the v1.3.1 release

@saad-ali saad-ali added this to the v1.3 milestone Jul 6, 2016
@saad-ali saad-ali added cherrypick-candidate release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. labels Jul 6, 2016
@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jul 7, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit d7150bf.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit 1c56319 into kubernetes:master Jul 7, 2016
@saad-ali
Copy link
Member

saad-ali commented Jul 7, 2016

@asalkeld Can you make sure to create a cherry pick for this to the 1.3 release branch.

@fabioy fabioy added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jul 19, 2016
@fabioy
Copy link
Contributor

fabioy commented Jul 19, 2016

@asalkeld Cherrypick approved. Please create a cherrypick PR. Thanks.

@fabioy
Copy link
Contributor

fabioy commented Jul 28, 2016

@asalkeld Ping on this.

@saad-ali
Copy link
Member

@fabioy This was already cherry-picked in #29560 (The PR number on that cherry pick was incorrect, but it has this, the correct, commit).

@fabioy
Copy link
Contributor

fabioy commented Jul 28, 2016

@saad-ali SG. Thanks for checking.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants