-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Kubeadm config refactor JoinControlPlane #70870
Kubeadm config refactor JoinControlPlane #70870
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
/lgtm
could nit, but we need to keep going.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini, timothysc The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/test pull-kubernetes-integration |
/test pull-kubernetes-integration |
29fcf1d
to
6b3bf3b
Compare
6b3bf3b
to
fa16137
Compare
/retest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
1 similar comment
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Retroactive LGTM. Thanks @fabriziopandini 🎉!
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
As agree in latest review of kubeadm v1beta1 api, we should introduce JoinControlPlane struct and make it pointer/nullable because it corresponds to an alpha feature
rif: kubernetes/kubeadm#911
Special notes for your reviewer:
/sig cluster-lifecycle
/cc @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews
/area kubeadm
/assign @timothysc
/assign @luxas
/cc @rosti
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: