-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add parallels machine driver to supported list #2807
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bassam Assign the PR to them by writing The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Hi, we're happy to drive CI changes to enable this support. Can someone please point us in the right direction? |
@dlorenc @aaron-prindle @r2d4 any input here would be appreciated. |
@praveenkumar where should the CI for this live? |
@dlorenc The driver changes CI should live to drivers repo and once we have that than minikube should have driver test as part of CI test like it has for hyperkit / virtualbox ..etc. |
@praveenkumar so I should add a file similar to https://github.com/kubernetes/minikube/blob/master/hack/jenkins/osx_integration_tests_hyperkit.sh? |
SGTM. @bassam I think @praveenkumar is saying the driver changes from this PR should be reverted and moved to a repo in the drivers org. Does that make sense? |
@dlorenc the parallels driver itself is in github.com/machine-drivers/docker-machine-parallels. The only changes in this repo is enabling minikube to use it just like virtualbox, etc. |
@dlorenc ping. |
It should be enabled like the VMware workstation driver as developed by
@anfernee
|
@gbraad does this look right to you? |
Will take some time to verify tomorrow or over the weekend. Busy schedule
at the moment.
…On Thu, Jun 21, 2018, 08:15 dlorenc ***@***.***> wrote:
@gbraad <https://github.com/gbraad> does this look right to you?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2807 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAHZp7RnrtsTeyLNLYasEkWiADzDGdDks5t-uW1gaJpZM4T9LNd>
.
|
I've tried this PR on my local MAC and I've been successfully able to run minikube with The cluster came up fine. The only issue i've seen is that when running
same when trying to mount a volume with
@bassam Well done! |
Signed-off-by: Bassam Tabbara <bassam@upbound.io>
a0ff97c
to
eb9ea85
Compare
@fenos I rebased and pushed new changes. I'm not seeing the issue with
I wonder what's different about our environments. Is it possible that you're running an older different version of minikube when running status vs. the one in the |
any update on this? I'm unclear as to what's needed to get this merged. |
Hi everyone, I realize you're all busy but this PR is at a standstill at this point and has been open for 2+ months. Can someone please point me in the right direction so that we can get this merged? |
@bassam I've merged this PR locally and run it against the most recent version of Parallels. Although a cluster provisions it never starts. It appears there is an issue when the scripts attempt to configure the VM. Have you had any similar issues? (Verbose log below) Starting cluster components... .: Process exited with status 1 |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
this PR has been open for 6 months and I'm still unsure what needs to be done for it to get merged. Maintainers please help. |
Do you mind addressing the merge conflict? I think it's just due to us moving away from Godeps. I'd like to see about merging this if it's still viable. My apologies for the unnecessarily long delay in reviewing this PR. I feel that this would be a great addition to the codebase as an initially experimental VM driver. |
I assume this is no longer needed after #953 was merged? |
closing in favor of #3650 |
This adds support for parallels machine driver.
It still needs CI tests. Can someone please point me in the right direction to add those?
Ref #2756 and #2606