Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CNV-23927: Do not count persistentVolumeClaim volumes in DeleteVMModal #1750

Merged

Conversation

upalatucci
Copy link
Member

@upalatucci upalatucci commented Jan 26, 2024

📝 Description

We should not count volumes that use PVC attached with persistentVolumeClaim in the DeleteVM modal.

Those volumes are attached to the VM as existing PVCs so they do not have the same VM lifecycle.

Maybe in the next version we can consider a checkbox list to let the user decide which disks wants to delete.

Demo

VM with one volume that use persistVolumeClaim

Before

image

After

image

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 26, 2024

@upalatucci: This pull request references CNV-23927 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

…that will not be deleted

📝 Description

We should not count volumes that use PVC attached with persistentVolumeClaim in the DeleteVM modal.

Those volumes are attached to the VM as existing PVCs so they do not have the same VM lifecycle.

Maybe in the next version we can consider a checkbox list to let the user decide which disks wants to delete.

Demo

VM with one volume that use persistVolumeClaim

Before

image

After

image

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved This issue is something we want to fix label Jan 26, 2024
@upalatucci upalatucci changed the title CNV-23927: Do not count persistentVolumeClaim volumes as they are existing PVCs … CNV-23927: Do not count persistentVolumeClaim volumes in DeleteVMModal Jan 26, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 26, 2024

@upalatucci: This pull request references CNV-23927 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

📝 Description

We should not count volumes that use PVC attached with persistentVolumeClaim in the DeleteVM modal.

Those volumes are attached to the VM as existing PVCs so they do not have the same VM lifecycle.

Maybe in the next version we can consider a checkbox list to let the user decide which disks wants to delete.

Demo

VM with one volume that use persistVolumeClaim

Before

image

After

image

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

pvcVolumesNames: isDataVolumeGarbageCollector
? pvcVolumesNames.concat(dvVolumesNames)
: pvcVolumesNames,
pvcVolumesNames: isDataVolumeGarbageCollector ? dvVolumesNames : [],

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, does it still make sense to call this "pvcVolumesNames"?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll propose a new thing in order to fix that.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Passed code review, ready for merge label Jan 28, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 28, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: avivtur, upalatucci

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@avivtur
Copy link
Member

avivtur commented Jan 28, 2024

/retest

2 similar comments
@metalice
Copy link
Member

/retest

@upalatucci
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit d173344 into kubevirt-ui:main Jan 29, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved This issue is something we want to fix jira/valid-reference lgtm Passed code review, ready for merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants