-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CNV-23927: Do not count persistentVolumeClaim volumes in DeleteVMModal #1750
CNV-23927: Do not count persistentVolumeClaim volumes in DeleteVMModal #1750
Conversation
@upalatucci: This pull request references CNV-23927 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@upalatucci: This pull request references CNV-23927 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
pvcVolumesNames: isDataVolumeGarbageCollector | ||
? pvcVolumesNames.concat(dvVolumesNames) | ||
: pvcVolumesNames, | ||
pvcVolumesNames: isDataVolumeGarbageCollector ? dvVolumesNames : [], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, does it still make sense to call this "pvcVolumesNames"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll propose a new thing in order to fix that.
…that will not be deleted
f47b904
to
06bc933
Compare
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: avivtur, upalatucci The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
2 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
📝 Description
We should not count volumes that use PVC attached with
persistentVolumeClaim
in the DeleteVM modal.Those volumes are attached to the VM as
existing PVCs
so they do not have the same VM lifecycle.Maybe in the next version we can consider a checkbox list to let the user decide which disks wants to delete.
Demo
VM with one volume that use
persistVolumeClaim
Before
After